Power of Privatization: Charging Snowden But Not the Company He Worked For?

Here’s a thought that’s been bothering me: I haven’t known the name of the company that Edward Snowden was working for when he stole US NSA data. I didn’t know the answer until just recently. Sounding like a character from a pulp fiction novel, it’s “Booz Allen Hamilton” (though that joke would work better if the “Booz” was in the middle). And while I haven’t followed the story so closely as to read every article on it, I’ve kept up with the news well enough I think, mostly through some of my usual sources (NPR, BBC, Economist, Fair Observer, NYT, etc.).

This is not to say it’s the fault of any of those organizations that I (and I suspect most of the US general public) don’t know the name. It’s dropped in there as with this article from The Guardian in mid-2013.

But collectively, they are know as “the Snowden leaks” (i.e. the¬†Alan Rusbridger¬†New York Review of Books article I just linked to there from November 2013 doesn’t mention that company at all). There are exceptions, of course, as there always are such as here or here.

I wish to point out that there been next to zero lasting interrogation of the company. All of the focus is on the celebrity of the moment, which is perhaps fitting in our times–even that CNN story linked to above gives a giant picture of Snowden under its headline about Booz Allen Hamilton.

It is surely the case that if Snowden is legally liable for his actions, it is certainly possible that Booz Allen Hamilton is as well. I may be mistaken, but I believe they call this “criminal negligence” in the business. Alas, the Air Force has declared the company did no wrong. Although, I might point out, that having an entity that might be liable itself in the creation of the problem is not the best choice for leading the investigation into it. Just a thought. In the least, one would think that the US government would seriously be considering dropping its contract (and even pursuing financial compensation in civil court). But that would require policymakers to admit they made a mistake, too, since 99% of Booz’s funding comes from the Federal Government.

Another reason no serious investigation has occurred thus far, however, is likely because so much of the US government work is privately contracted. Despite having many of the best-trained US military personnel in the world, the military and state department decided at some point that contractors were better. (Side note: please suggest any great histories on this topic for us in the comments below–if not, dibs on this as my next project after this pesky dissertation).

And finally, I think, there is the culture of veneration for business, which in America, can do no wrong. Chemicals spilled into a West Virginian river? It’s automatically the “fault” of regulation (e.g. government).

Although both were leaks, I worry that the public is not holding all parties equally accountable.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Power of Privatization: Charging Snowden But Not the Company He Worked For?

  1. Stole? What planet do you live on? For the love of humanity, in case you’ve paid absolutely no attention to any news whatsoever, the IRS steals your earnings, then provides those earnings to the NSA which sometimes directly steals your data from telecommunications companies and sometimes contracts out to other companies to do so. The federal government has no right to this information – it does not belong to them. It belongs to the individual consumers and the telecommunications companies. Snowden didn’t steal anything. Snowden was hired to help process stolen data. Gradually disgusted with what he and the administration were doing, he leaked the fact that the U.S. government is acting criminally and illegitimately in this regard.
    Now where in the name of flying spaghetti do you get Snowden stealing U.S. information?!?!?!?!?!?! Hello?!

  2. I would like to say I appreciate your comment, but alas, I cannot. I knew this would happen once I wrote “stole.” This post has absolutely nothing to do with what your comment is about. Once you re-read the post, I’ll take the time to offer a response.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s